Skip to main content

An Education & Coco Before Chanel

Is 2009 the year that Chick flicks will actually be taken seriously?

I decide what to see often based on critical consensus, and as  result I don't often notice whether I'm seeing films made by women. Looking back, it appears that most years I see close to 100 films and only a few are made by women.  I've been averaging 6 films/year that have been directed by women with the majority of those never receive a major theatrical release. This year, that number has already doubles and many of these are critically acclaimed. I've already written about the depiction of women in two of this year's woman directed films, Jennifer's Body and Whip It, but I've also seen Sunshine Cleaning (Christine Jeffs), Humpday (Lynn Shelton), Sita Sings the Blues (Nina Paley), Talhotblond (Barbara Schroder), We Live in Public (Ondi Timoner), The Escape (Katherine Windfeld) and The Hurt Locker (Katherine Bigalow). But this year, there have been two very notable releases, An Education (Lone Sherfig) and Coco before Chanel (Anne Fontaine), films made by women about being a woman. And both films must be doing well at the box office, since they have each remained on the same screen for several weeks now.

What is particularly striking about An Education and Coco Before Chanel is that both films are about the limitations imposed by simply being born a woman. One could argue that this is due to their historical settings, but in reality, both films beautifully illustrate that 20th Century women must decide what they are willing to do to achieve success. While An Education dramatically depicts the heart-break of adolescence when young women realize that most of their dreams are so unattainable as to be only fantasy. Coco Before Chanel is about an older woman who is equally driven, but understands exactly what it takes achieve independence and does so without any hint of disgrace. And both films also are also praiseworthy for the skills of their actresses, Carey Mulligan and Audrey Tautou, which both are incredible in these films.
In An Education, Jenny (Carey Mulligan) is completely focused on her dream to go to Oxford. She is a star pupil with dreams of Paris and a taste for great art and music. Everything is going as planned until she meets an older man, David (Peter Sarsgaard), who charms her and shows her that there is more to life then books. But she also begins to see her life differently. After all of the studying and very hard work, and Oxford education does not guarantee anything for a young woman. The educated women in Jenny's life are her teachers and David's exciting entrance into her life has revealed that even her parents only hope that Oxford will bring her better marriage prospects. So when David reveals himself a cad, after Jenny has already given up her Oxford dreams in favor of living, Jenny is left with a very uncertain future. But she will show much more caution when confronted with promises made by men and her own hopes and dreams are certain to be tempered by this "education".

I found An Education to be a heartbreaking movie that rang so true to my own experiences, so much so that I couldn't move until after the credits had finished. Not that An Education is inherintly sad, it is just the way that women learn and grow into women that is sad.

But Coco Before Chanel does not deal with a young women enduring the heartbreak inherent in growing up.  The film begins with a father leaving his two daughters at an orphanage.   As adults, the girls get by using their seamstress skills and singing at cafes. It is through this latter trade that Gabrielle was given the nickname Coco by a wealthy playboy, Etienne Balsan (Benoit Poelvoorde), and she becomes his mistress after her sister goes off with a wealthy suitor and Gabrielle is left without a singing partner and few other options.

Actually, this is where Coco Before Chanel shines. Audrey Tautou displays a quiet confidence as Coco. Despite her humility being constantly tested, she maintains a stoic air of determination.  She doesn't have any means of her own, but her ambition pushes her to make smart choices and also helps keep her pride in check.  So she decides to make herself available to Balsan, who seems happy enough to give her a room to stay in as long as she disappears anytime he has guests. And it is in Balsan's home that she meets people with the means that eventually allows her to open her own house of fashion.

While both films are excellent portraits of ambitious women, instead of only being a reminder of just how difficult it is to be a girl, Coco Before Chanel depicts an amazing success story.  Looking back, 2009 appears to have been a year with more cinema made for and by women.  Now, I'm just hoping that this will be a year when a few women will be recognized for their talents or at least maybe Hollywood will remember the success of women in film and offer to fund even more films made by and for women.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhastan

Right after seeing Sacha Baron Cohen's film, Borat, I was disappointed. I didn't laugh nearly as hard as I had hoped and it wasn't quite as outrageous as I had expected. But in retrospect, I have to admit the comic brilliance of Borat. Sacha Baron Cohen has adeptly created a film about a fictional man, Borat, from a fictionalized Kazakhastan and used this creation to show the hipocracy of America. Using tactics pioneered by reality television shows, Borat travels across America on a quest to find his true love, Pamela Anderson. On this journey, he meets numerous people who share their thoughts about a multitude of things, exposing the way some Americans really believe about race, class, homosexuality and the other sex. It is a very interesting film. Sure, it gets laughs from ambushing Pamela Anderson with a wedding bag, traveling with a bear, and a bit of naked wrestling, but this film is also very smart in its sly portrayal of the wealth of prejudices that are ali

Horror?

From Blogger I apparently have no clue what a horror movie is. Or at least, when the challenge rolls around and I take the leap and attempt to watch 31 horror movies, I suddenly feel as if I have no idea what that means. There are times when it is obvious that a movie is horror; Friday the 13th, Halloween, Texas Chainsaw Massacre . Once I dive into the challenge, I begin to question whether the movies I'm seeing really count. This year, I've seen Buried, Carrie, Clean, Shaven, Nosferatu (1922), Scanners, Sisters , and I sell the Dead . Nate protested Sisters, saying DePalma's movie about a pair of disturbed Siamese twins isn't a horror movie. And he has a point, but how is one supposed to choose movies without having seen them before to really know whether they are horror? Especially since I'm only using the challenge to catch up on movies that I should see because they are classics and to re-watch a few others that need to be revisited. But picking the

My attempt at Filmspotting's Top 5 List

I just finished listening to Filmspotting podcast, episode #296, and I've been inspired to begin a small project. My concept of great cinema has changed now that I live in a place with so many choices. When I lived in Anchorage, I primarily saw movies at the local Art House, Capri Cinema. Rand, being an out gay man, tended to show a lot of GLBT cinema as well as the better known independent/art house films. The years I lived in Columbia, I watched more mainstream film and really, just about everything that came to town that sounded at all interesting. But in Seattle, the choices are overwhelming by comparison. Sometimes I'll see a classic film, or a film with a lot of buzz, and there are a lot of foreign language films, because of the wide variety of cinema I have access to, I am now a very devoted fan of Asian cinema. The filmmakers in Hong Kong, Korea, China, Japan, Thailand are incredible. And this isn't at all limited to the genre films that have made Asian film