Skip to main content

Chronicle

My immediate reaction to Chronicle was amazement that I couldn't figure out how to concisely describe the film as it refuses to fit neatly into a familiar genre. This was totally unexpected since Chronicle was written by Max Landis, son of John Landis, best known for making An American Werewolf in London, but while one can draw comparisons with Carrie, I hesitate to call Chronicle a horror movie. It could also be superhero origin story, but while the teens do acquire superhuman powers, it also ultimately skeptical of heroism, so the tone definitely keeps it outside of the superhero genre. Ultimately, Chronicle functions as a modern morality play, a cautionary story that warns of the corrupting properties of power.

Chronicle is a found footage movie, popularized in numerous horror movies, presenting the story from the viewpoint of Andrew (Dane DeHaan), as he is documents his life with a video camera and at the beginning, we get a first glimpse of his home life when his father interrupts his editing, loudly warning him to keep his bedroom door open and do his homework. But the story doesn't really begin to unfold until Andrew leaves a party to follow his cousin, Matt (Alex Russell), and popular student, Steve (Michael B. Jordan), into a mysterious hole in the ground. When they re-emerge, they have telekinetic abilities. At first, they are used for hands-free lego creations and potato chip consumption, but later, they begin to use their strengthening powers to dazzle fellow students, increasing Matt and especially Andrew's reputation.

The strength of Chronicle is the attention given to character development. The teens are not the simple archetypes that are the staple of the high school movie. Andrew is an unpopular loner, which is easy to empathize with considering the dysfunctionality at home. His father is an alcoholic and his mother is chronically ill and in constant pain. But the film is nuanced enough to slowly reveal that the reason Andrew's father isn't working is that he is an ex-firefighter, no longer able to work and therefore on disability and using a bit too much booze to forget his troubles. While Andrew is often furious at his father, the film never acts to demonize him and if anything humanizes him.

Andrew's friends are also well realized. Steve is popular. He's running for class president and appears to be friends with everyone, but this seems only natural. Steve is very charismatic and genuinely a nice guy. It only makes sense that his peers would like him. And Andrew's cousin, Matt, is not popular, but doesn't share Andrew's outcast perspective. In fact, Matt appears to work to include Andrew simply because he knows he has few friends, inviting him to the party where they venture into the deep, hole in the earth. It is after, that this experience bonds them, giving them a shared secret. And they each consider using these new powers in different ways. Steve sees these powers as a nifty party trick and way to increase Andrew's status among his classmates, Matt becomes concerned as these powers strengthen, that they could be used to hurt others and Andrew is completely focused on controlling and using these new found powers, with no thought as to whether they should be used. Once he grasps the desperation of his parents situation, Andrew begins to strike out and Chronicle thus becomes an illustration of moral downfall or maybe a super-villain origin tale?

The one thing that bothered me about Chronicle is the scene depicted on the movie posters. Recently, there have been quite a few movies that have been obviously filmed in Vancouver, but set in Seattle that are laughable. 50/50 was the worst offender with random, Seattle street signs on obviously Canadian streets and was pleasantly surprised that Chronicle, being filmed in S. Africa, really did seem like Seattle. Even the news coverage was spot on accurate. No, my issue with the final, Space Needle battle is due to CGI. Even well done CGI has a weightlessness that I really don't ever believe. I really would prefer to see an occasional wire or obvious plastic monsters to the massless gloss of CGI. Evidence that I am old? But otherwise, I found Chronicle to be a surprising movie and best of all, a movie unlike anything I've seen.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhastan

Right after seeing Sacha Baron Cohen's film, Borat, I was disappointed. I didn't laugh nearly as hard as I had hoped and it wasn't quite as outrageous as I had expected. But in retrospect, I have to admit the comic brilliance of Borat. Sacha Baron Cohen has adeptly created a film about a fictional man, Borat, from a fictionalized Kazakhastan and used this creation to show the hipocracy of America. Using tactics pioneered by reality television shows, Borat travels across America on a quest to find his true love, Pamela Anderson. On this journey, he meets numerous people who share their thoughts about a multitude of things, exposing the way some Americans really believe about race, class, homosexuality and the other sex. It is a very interesting film. Sure, it gets laughs from ambushing Pamela Anderson with a wedding bag, traveling with a bear, and a bit of naked wrestling, but this film is also very smart in its sly portrayal of the wealth of prejudices that are ali

Horror?

From Blogger I apparently have no clue what a horror movie is. Or at least, when the challenge rolls around and I take the leap and attempt to watch 31 horror movies, I suddenly feel as if I have no idea what that means. There are times when it is obvious that a movie is horror; Friday the 13th, Halloween, Texas Chainsaw Massacre . Once I dive into the challenge, I begin to question whether the movies I'm seeing really count. This year, I've seen Buried, Carrie, Clean, Shaven, Nosferatu (1922), Scanners, Sisters , and I sell the Dead . Nate protested Sisters, saying DePalma's movie about a pair of disturbed Siamese twins isn't a horror movie. And he has a point, but how is one supposed to choose movies without having seen them before to really know whether they are horror? Especially since I'm only using the challenge to catch up on movies that I should see because they are classics and to re-watch a few others that need to be revisited. But picking the

My attempt at Filmspotting's Top 5 List

I just finished listening to Filmspotting podcast, episode #296, and I've been inspired to begin a small project. My concept of great cinema has changed now that I live in a place with so many choices. When I lived in Anchorage, I primarily saw movies at the local Art House, Capri Cinema. Rand, being an out gay man, tended to show a lot of GLBT cinema as well as the better known independent/art house films. The years I lived in Columbia, I watched more mainstream film and really, just about everything that came to town that sounded at all interesting. But in Seattle, the choices are overwhelming by comparison. Sometimes I'll see a classic film, or a film with a lot of buzz, and there are a lot of foreign language films, because of the wide variety of cinema I have access to, I am now a very devoted fan of Asian cinema. The filmmakers in Hong Kong, Korea, China, Japan, Thailand are incredible. And this isn't at all limited to the genre films that have made Asian film