Skip to main content

2021 Psychotronic Challenge

 It the time of year to delve deep into the horror genre. This year, I'm using Scarecrow Video's 2021 Psychotronic Challenge as a guide. I'm finding that in order to meet the challenge, I'm re-watching instread of doing a lot of first time viewings this year, but it is good to dust off the videos and DVDs hiding in the back of the media cabinet as I remember the movies that meet the criteria. Also, I'm ignoring that these are supposed to be low-budget and just sticking to anything that would fall into the horror genre. 

Day 1 - 

"RE-ANIMATED: Businesses are opening back up and things are getting back to “normal” so to kick things off you get to watch a movie where something gets brought back to life. We’re baaaaaack!"

Kicked off the month with Demon Seed (1977) after seeing a trailer for the film and being curious about a movie where Julie Christy is impregnated by a demon. Well, it wasn't that. She was instead taken captive and experimented on by her scientist husband's smart house. Seriously messed up movie complete with creepy robot rape scene. 

As there was no actual re-animation in the movie, I followed it up with a classic, Young Frankenstein (1974). It was a delight as always, although my DVD is showing it's age as it isn't anamorphic. We talked about watching Re-Animator instead, but Scout is only a year old and I thought it was too soon to traumatize her with the sight of a re-animated cat. 

Day 2 - 

MASKS ARE STILL REQUIRED: You know it, at least one character has to wear a mask for the entire movie 

Started early on Saturday with The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, part 2 (1986). Found this on VHS at Goodwill and hadn't gotten around to watching it. I found this much funnier and more enjoyable than I remembered. 

And then made it a mask double-feature with Eyes Without a Face (1960). Last October, I watching nothing but horror from the 1960s since it might be my favorite decade for scary movies. So I used the theme as an excuse to pull out my Criterion DVD. Just a gorgeous film. 

Day 3 -

HIGH SPIRITS: Tickle your funny bones with a side splitter, a gut buster, a real scream. Go on, laugh your head off!

More horror comedies. Seems I'm going to watch all of the lighter stuff at the early part of the challenge. Another Goodwill find was an unopened VHS of the Fearless Vampire Killers (1967). Let's just say that I remembered this being funnier. Did they actually get around to killing a single vampire? I don't think they did. I also forgot to laugh.

So Nate served up Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1992) followed up with The Final Girls (2015).  It was likely 1992 the last time I saw Buffy. I'd forgotten that Rutger Hauer had a mustache. Odd choice for an ancient vampire. And while I was generally entertained by The Final Girls, we spent way too much time trying to figure out how mom could have been in an 80s teen slasher, when mom only looked to be maybe 35 years old. Very confusing. 


Popular posts from this blog


From Blogger I apparently have no clue what a horror movie is. Or at least, when the challenge rolls around and I take the leap and attempt to watch 31 horror movies, I suddenly feel as if I have no idea what that means. There are times when it is obvious that a movie is horror; Friday the 13th, Halloween, Texas Chainsaw Massacre . Once I dive into the challenge, I begin to question whether the movies I'm seeing really count. This year, I've seen Buried, Carrie, Clean, Shaven, Nosferatu (1922), Scanners, Sisters , and I sell the Dead . Nate protested Sisters, saying DePalma's movie about a pair of disturbed Siamese twins isn't a horror movie. And he has a point, but how is one supposed to choose movies without having seen them before to really know whether they are horror? Especially since I'm only using the challenge to catch up on movies that I should see because they are classics and to re-watch a few others that need to be revisited. But picking the

My attempt at Filmspotting's Top 5 List

I just finished listening to Filmspotting podcast, episode #296, and I've been inspired to begin a small project. My concept of great cinema has changed now that I live in a place with so many choices. When I lived in Anchorage, I primarily saw movies at the local Art House, Capri Cinema. Rand, being an out gay man, tended to show a lot of GLBT cinema as well as the better known independent/art house films. The years I lived in Columbia, I watched more mainstream film and really, just about everything that came to town that sounded at all interesting. But in Seattle, the choices are overwhelming by comparison. Sometimes I'll see a classic film, or a film with a lot of buzz, and there are a lot of foreign language films, because of the wide variety of cinema I have access to, I am now a very devoted fan of Asian cinema. The filmmakers in Hong Kong, Korea, China, Japan, Thailand are incredible. And this isn't at all limited to the genre films that have made Asian film

Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhastan

Right after seeing Sacha Baron Cohen's film, Borat, I was disappointed. I didn't laugh nearly as hard as I had hoped and it wasn't quite as outrageous as I had expected. But in retrospect, I have to admit the comic brilliance of Borat. Sacha Baron Cohen has adeptly created a film about a fictional man, Borat, from a fictionalized Kazakhastan and used this creation to show the hipocracy of America. Using tactics pioneered by reality television shows, Borat travels across America on a quest to find his true love, Pamela Anderson. On this journey, he meets numerous people who share their thoughts about a multitude of things, exposing the way some Americans really believe about race, class, homosexuality and the other sex. It is a very interesting film. Sure, it gets laughs from ambushing Pamela Anderson with a wedding bag, traveling with a bear, and a bit of naked wrestling, but this film is also very smart in its sly portrayal of the wealth of prejudices that are ali